FuelCellsWorks

Industry News & Information Leader

SFC EFOY ReliOn Hydrogenics Honda Plug Power Toyota BMW

Latest News

Fuel cells get a boost

At left, a high-resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy image of platinum nanoparticles on a fuel cell's electrode reveals surface steps that researchers say are responsible for dramatically improving efficiency. These steps are shown in greater detail in the diagram at the right. Image: Journal of American Chemical Society

At left, a high-resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy image of platinum nanoparticles on a fuel cell's electrode reveals surface steps that researchers say are responsible for dramatically improving efficiency. These steps are shown in greater detail in the diagram at the right. Image: Journal of American Chemical Society

Fuel cells, devices that can produce electricity from hydrogen or other fuels without burning them, are considered a promising new way of powering everything from homes and cars to portable devices like cellphones and laptop computers. Their big advantage — the prospect of eliminating emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants — has been outweighed by their very high cost, and researchers have been trying to find ways to make the devices less expensive.

Now, an MIT team led by Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering Yang Shao-Horn has found a method that promises to dramatically increase the efficiency of the electrodes in one type of fuel cell, which uses methanol instead of hydrogen as its fuel and is considered promising as a replacement for batteries in portable electronic devices. Since these electrodes are made of platinum, increasing their efficiency means that much less of the expensive metal is needed to produce a given amount of power.

The key to the boost in efficiency, the team found, was to change the surface texture of the material. Instead of leaving it smooth, the researchers gave it tiny stairsteps. This approximately doubled the electrode’s ability to catalyze oxidation of the fuel and thus produce electric current. The researchers believe that further development of these surface structures could end up producing far greater increases, yielding more electric current for a given amount of platinum.

Their results are reported Oct. 13 in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. The paper’s eight authors include chemical engineering graduate student Seung Woo Lee and mechanical engineering postdoctoral researcher Shuo Chen, along with Shao-Horn and other researchers at MIT, the Japan Institute of Science and Technology, and Brookhaven National Laboratory.

“One of our research focuses is to develop active and stable catalysts,” Shao-Horn says, and this new work is a significant step toward “figuring out how the surface atomic structure can enhance the activity of the catalyst” in direct methanol fuel cells.

Resolving a controversy

In their experiments, the team used platinum nanoparticles deposited on the surface of multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Lee says that many people have been experimenting with the use of platinum nanoparticles for fuel cells, but the results of the particle size effect on the activity so far have been contradictory and controversial. “Some people see the activity increase, some people see a decrease” in activity as the particle size decreases. “There has been a controversy about how size affects activity.”

The new work shows that the key factor is not the size of the particles, but the details of their surface structure. “We show the details of surface steps presented on nanoparticles and relate the amount of surface steps to the activity,” Chen says. By producing a surface with multiple steps on it, the team doubled the activity of the electrode, and the team members are now working on creating surfaces with even more steps to try to increase the activity further. Theoretically, they say, it should be possible to enhance the activity by orders of magnitude.

Shao-Horn suggests that the key factor is the addition of the edges of the steps, which seem to provide a site where it’s easier for atoms to form new bonds. The addition of steps creates more of those active sites. In addition, the team has shown that the step structures are stable enough to be maintained over hundreds of cycles. That stability is key to being able to develop practical and effective direct methanol fuel cells.

Team members also hope to understand whether the steps enhance the other part of the process that takes place in a fuel cell. This study looked at the enhancement of oxidation, but the other side of a fuel cell undergoes oxygen reduction. Does the addition of steps to the surface also enhance the oxygen reduction? “We need to find why it does, or why it doesn’t,” Shao-Horn says. The researchers expect to have answers to that question in the next few months.

October 16, 2009 - 7:50 AM No Comments

Congress OKs hydrogen funds

Congress voted Thursday to include $174 million in next year’s budget for hydrogen transportation research.

The Energy and Water Appropriations Bill now goes to President Barack Obama’s desk. He is expected to sign it, said Kyle Michel, the Washington lobbyist for Columbia and the state of South Carolina.

“The White House has not expressed any reservations with the bill,” he said.

That is quite a turnaround.

The program, administered by the Energy Department, was funded at $169 million last year. But the Obama administration through Energy Secretary Stephen Chu in May proposed cutting the funding by more than half to $68 million.

He told lawmakers that taxpayer money was better spent on research for electric cars, better batteries for plug-in cars and biofuels, which he deemed quicker fixes than hydrogen for the nation’s dependence on foreign oil.

But intense lobbying from the delegations of South Carolina and other hydrogen states, including California, persuaded the House and Senate to restore the funding and increase it by $5 million over last year.

“Congress’ restoration of hydrogen funding validates our belief that hydrogen has a bright future as an alternative energy source for our country,” said Columbia Mayor Bob Coble, who along with S.C. House Speaker Bobby Harrell have been the chief advocates for hydrogen and fuel cells in the state.

Coble credited U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C.. the House Majority Whip and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., for helping to restore the funding.

The proposed funding cut would have not affected research at the University of South Carolina or Clemson, which study fuel cells and automobile platforms, respectively. But grants might have dried up at the Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, which studies hydrogen production and storage.

It’s unclear which grants and how much would have been affected, said Shannon Baxter-Clemmons, executive director the S.C. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Alliance.

“They still are not sure about the money,” she said. “Some grants might get moved around.”

A greater impact would have been on public opinion. If Congress had cut funding for hydrogen vehicle research, it would have sent a signal that South Carolina had backed the wrong technology.

So Baxter called the passage “fantastic news.”

She noted that several auto makers, chief among them Toyota, Honda, General Motors and Daimler, have announced that hydrogen fueled cars will be hitting showrooms around the world in the 2015 and cost only about $3,600 more than a mid-sized sedans.

“So the timing is perfect” for the funding, she said.

Last spring, the National Hydrogen Association held its annual conference in Columbia.

Patrick Serfass, the association’s spokesman, said the funding was part of a package of alternative energy funding intended to stem the nation’s dependence on foreign oil.

“We continue to be thrilled that Congress has been showing their support for a portfolio of clean energy technology that includes hydrogen and fuel cells,” he said from his Washington office. “Some people are in search of a silver bullet solution, but we think that embracing a variety of technologies is the smart way to proceed.”

But critics of government spending for hydrogen research claim that the technology is the longest shot and has yet to find a market in South Carolina.

“Obviously the lobbyists won this round,” said Ashley Landess of the libertarian think tank S.C. Policy Council. “There is no other explanation on why they would fund it when there is no private sector business interest and no demand for it – at least in South Carolina. The only interest here is by the government.”

October 16, 2009 - 7:42 AM No Comments