Toward Cost-Effective Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Toward Cost-Effective Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells
author Added by FuelCellsWorks, August 09, 2016

As we enter the age of hybrid, electric and self-driving cars, interest remains high in finding the next generation of fuel cell technology that is low cost, long lasting and mass producible. In recent years, fuel cell research and development efforts have been focused on improving performance and reducing costs through the development of new materials and better water and heat management processes.

Toward this end, a research team running density functional theory (DFT) calculations at Berkeley Lab's NERSC center has demonstrated how one type of fuel cell—polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs)—can be made to run more efficiently and produced more cost-effectively by reducing the amount of a single key ingredient: platinum. Their findings were published April 28, 2016 in the Journal of Materials Chemistry A and featured on the issue’s inside front cover.

While the concept of the fuel cell—generating electricity by reversing the electrolysis of water—dates back to the mid 1800s, it took until 1932 to achieve the first successful fuel cell device: a hydrogen-oxygen cell that used alkaline electrolytes and nickel electrodes. By the 1950s, NASA began investing in the technology for use in its space program, and over the years fuel cells have supplied electricity to numerous space missions.

Today a variety of fuel cell technologies—distinguished by their electrolytes—are being developed and tested as an alternative to the internal combustion engine and other energy sources. In addition to PEFCs, these include:

  • Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), an electrochemical conversion device that uses a ceramic electrolyte or solid oxide
  • Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs), high temperature fuel cells that use an electrolyte composed of a molten carbonate salt mixture suspended in a porous, chemically inert ceramic matrix of beta-alumina solid electrolyte
  • Phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFCs), which use liquid phosphoric acid as the electrolyte and were the first fuel cells to be commercialized

Each has its pros and cons; for example, while SOFCs exhibit relatively higher efficiency and are relatively low cost, their high operating temperature—in the 500-1,000oC range—results in longer start-up times and mechanical and chemical compatibility issues. Conversely, PEFCs—which also have high energy conversion efficiency—operate at much lower temperatures (< 100oC), which results in much faster start-up times (within seconds).

Leading Candidate for Transportation Applications

As a result, PEFCs are considered the leading candidate for use in transportation applications and for megawatt-size power generation systems. However, figuring out how to produce these fuel cells efficiently and cost-effectively at mass scale has proven to be a challenge. The culprit lies in the cathode materials typically found in current PEFCs, which use platinum-based electrodes and a water-based, acidic polymer membrane as the electrolyte. The problem? Platinum is expensive.

“Even though PEFCs are well known as an ideal electrical power system, the utilization of platinum hinders the cost-effective commercialization of these type of fuel cells,” said Yongman Choi, lead scientist at the SABIC Technology Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and a co-author on the Journal of Materials Chemistry A study. Choi's collaborators included Mi Hwang and Gu-Gon Park at Korea Institute of Energy Research.

While some non-precious metal-based catalysts have demonstrated enhanced activity, their oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity is still inferior to that of platinum-based catalysts, resulting in a much thicker electrode. Thus Choi and his colleagues DFT calculations to test a non-precious-metal-based cathode material containing only a small amount of platinum. Their calculations, which used approximately 300,000 core hours at NERSC—a DOE Office of Science user facility—confirmed that platinum nanoclusters on metal–nitrogen doped ordered mesoporous porphyrinic carbon significantly enhance the ORR activity.

“Although more studies, including stability examination, are imperative, it is promising to reduce the cost by lowering the platinum amount in the fuel cell electrodes,” Choi said. “The confirmation of the experimental finding on the basis of scientific models like this study using DFT-based simulations can guide the design of new catalytic materials that have high activity and stability.”

About Computing Sciences at Berkeley Lab

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) Computing Sciences organization provides the computing and networking resources and expertise critical to advancing the Department of Energy's research missions: developing new energy sources, improving energy efficiency, developing new materials and increasing our understanding of ourselves, our world and our universe.

ESnet, the Energy Sciences Network, provides the high-bandwidth, reliable connections that link scientists at 40 DOE research sites to each other and to experimental facilities and supercomputing centers around the country. The National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) powers the discoveries of 6,000 scientists at national laboratories and universities, including those at Berkeley Lab's Computational Research Division (CRD). CRD conducts research and development in mathematical modeling and simulation, algorithm design, data storage, management and analysis, computer system architecture and high-performance software implementation.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory addresses the world's most urgent scientific challenges by advancing sustainable energy, protecting human health, creating new materials, and revealing the origin and fate of the universe. Founded in 1931, Berkeley Lab's scientific expertise has been recognized with 13 Nobel prizes. The University of California manages Berkeley Lab for the DOE’s Office of Science. The Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States.

Contact: Kathy Kincade, [email protected], 510-495-2124